Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Williams v. USA
as 3:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Eugene Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 4:2020cv00441
Petitioner:
Lyle Eugene Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. South Mississippi Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Timothy Barnes, South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Georgia Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Williams v. Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01094
Defendant:
Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Williams v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06522
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eugene Williams v. Jenny Scheef, et al
as 19-10047
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNY K. SCHEEF, LVN, TEXAS TECH MEDICAL BRANCH, EDWARD PHARR, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Williams v. Scheef et al
as 5:2018cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Jenny K Scheef, Edward Pharr, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Scheef et al
as 2:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Jenny K Scheef, Edward Pharr, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00109
Petitioner:
Sylvester Eugene Williams
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00083
Petitioner:
Sylvester Eugene Williams
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
