Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bozeman v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Bozeman
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter #6469, Frito-Lay Sales, Inc. and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Stringer v. Frito-Lay Corporation
as 22-60518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Lavel Stringer
Defendant / Appellee:
Frito-Lay Corporation, Kroger Food Corporation and Pepsi Corporation, A Parent Company to Frito-Lay
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hill et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brian Hill, Jason Mathis and Cruz Vasquez
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Montgomery v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Starr Montgomery
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
