Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch Bd
as 23-30602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. C. Moore, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore, Henry Smith, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith and Cassandra Butler
Defendant / Appellee:
Tangipahoa Parish School Board, a corporation
Appellee:
Janice Fultz Richards, President, Tangipahoa Parish School Board and Melissa Martin Stilley, Superintendent, Tangipahoa Parish School System
Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch Bd
as 23-30328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. C. Moore, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and Henry Smith, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Tangipahoa Parish School Board, a corporation
Appellee:
Janice Fultz Richards, President, Tangipahoa Parish School Board and Melissa Martin Stilley, Superintendent, Tangipahoa Parish School System
Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd
as 22-30683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. C. Moore, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and Henry Smith, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Tangipahoa Parish School Board, a corporation, C. Glenn Westmoreland, President and Melissa Martin Stilley, Superintendent
Moore v. Tangipahoa Prsh Sch Bd
as 21-30244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. C. Moore, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and Henry Smith, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Tangipahoa Parish School Board, a corporation
Interested Party:
Melissa Stilley, Superintendent, Tangipahoa Parish School System
M. Moore, et al v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board
as 15-31119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C. MOORE, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and HENRY SMITH, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant - Appellant:
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, a corporation
M. Moore, et al v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board
as 15-30759
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C. MOORE, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and HENRY SMITH, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, a corporation
Intervenor - Appellant:
TANGIPAHOA CHARTER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
Smith v. Citibank NA
as 3:2015cv01930
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Defendant:
Citibank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fassitt et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2014cv00779
Plaintiff:
Gregore Fassitt , Jason Gesser , Kali Gesser and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Riddell, Inc., All American Sports Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00092
Petitioner:
Henry Smith
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
M.C. Moore, et al v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, et al
as 12-31218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C. MOORE, as father and next friend to minors Joyce Marie Moore, Jerry Moore, and Thelma Louise Moore and HENRY SMITH, as father and next friend to minors Bennie Smith, Charles Edward Smith, Shirley Ann Smith, and Earline Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, a corporation
Movant - Appellant:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN WHITE, Louisiana Superintendent of Education and LOUISIANA BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
