Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Holtz v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv05463
Plaintiff:
Courtney Holtz
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company a/k/a United Services Automobile Association a/k/a USAA, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, USAA General Indemnity Company and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Holtz v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Nickolas P Holtz
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard v. Holtz
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Belinda Richard
Defendant:
Rick Holtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Holtz v. Mencar OTR LLC. et al
as 5:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Cody Holtz doing business as Cody Trucking
Defendant:
Mencar OTR LLC. and Julio Saldivar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00346
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00347
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gilbert v. Nodolf et al
as 7:2019cv00231
Defendant:
FNU Holtz, The State of Texas, Ms. FNU Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Christopher Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Nodolf et al
as 1:2019cv00959
Defendant:
FNU Holtz, The State of Texas, Ms. FNU Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Christopher Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Nodolf et al
as 7:2019cv00130
Defendant:
FNU Ward, FNU Holtz, The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Christopher Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holtz v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13551
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pamela Holtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
