Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Shaw
as 21-60886
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Jerome Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Frank Shaw
Williams v. Shaw
as 3:2020cv00778
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billy Williams v. Paul Reilley, et al
as 20-40310
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REILLEY, HELEN PARKER, LVN and APRIL PERSINGER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLY JEROME WILLIAMS
Williams v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04131
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerome Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Williams v. Reilley et al
as 9:2018cv00195
Defendant:
April Persinger, Paul Reilley and Helen Parker
Plaintiff:
Billy Jerome Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Sr. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09530
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hillard Jerome Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jerome Williams v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00780
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jason William
as 11-50525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON JEROME WILLIAMS
Williams et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv04353
Plaintiff:
Jerome Williams and Betty Williams
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerome Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-50840
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME WILLIAMS, also known as Ed Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
