Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Edison v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Steven Edison
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Brian Hutchins, Robert Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry . Smith, Smith County, Compliance Sergeant FNU Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kohute v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Timothy James Chappelle
Respondent:
Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips vs. County of Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Karen Kay Phillips
Respondent:
County of Smith, Philip Greanead, Johnathan Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Durst v. Smith County et al
as 6:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jacob Durst
Defendant:
Smith County, Unknown William, Unknown Blackmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips vs. County of Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
Karen Kay Phillips
Defendant:
County Of Smith, Philip Greanead, Johnathan Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Jackson et al
as 6:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Chappelle
Defendant:
Austin Reeve Jackson, Unknown Nipp, Larry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Smith
as 6:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Raymond Lonzo Morgan
Respondent:
Smith County Sheriff Larry . Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. 20 Defendants et al
as 4:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Candace Lanell Walker and Candace Lanell Walker-Baldwin
Defendant:
20 Defendants, Arch Diocese, Cynthia Lanell Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
