Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding *RESTRICTED FILER* v. Reeves et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Marc McClure, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Dennis Thompson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGhee v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
George Lee McGhee
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Leslie Galloway, III
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Charles Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
