Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lopez Alcala v. F.J. Garrido, Warden
as 4:2023cv00596
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Lopez Alcala
Respondent:
F. J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Joaquin-Lopez
as 21-40262
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Joaquin-Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Lopez Calixto v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2020cv01227
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Plaintiff:
Miguel Jose Lopez Calixto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cairo et al v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2020cv01168
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gonzalez, Palmer Haxans-Waldell, Robert Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00140
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Lopez-Castanon v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60850
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ-CASTANON
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Huerta-Calderon v. Lopez-Hernandez et al
as 3:2018cv00214
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Lopez-Hernandez and Transportes Lyrma De Ciudad Juarez, S.A. de C.V.
Plaintiff:
Hugo A. Huerta-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez-Ordonez v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Lopez-Ordonez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aguilar et al v. Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
as 3:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Deiby Aguilar , Diego Alejandro , Daniel Dominguez Arevalo and others
Defendant:
Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
Claimant:
Harren & Partner SUMO-Shipping GmbH & Co KG MS "PALMAROLA"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
