Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Swallow v. Carroll et al
as 1:2020cv00491
Plaintiff:
Elijah Burke Swallow
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Jane Doe, Lieutenant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely v. Woods et al
as 1:2019cv00043
Defendant:
FNU Regan, John Doe, Lt. FNU Moss and others
Plaintiff:
James A McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Smith v. Pat Knauth, et al
as 17-41078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, also known as Tamieko Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT KNAUTH, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, BRYAN LAINE, Appeal Counsel, RIFE KIMLER, Defense Counsel and others
Dewayne Clubb v. Jefferson County, et al
as 17-40576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE RAY CLUBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, Texas, JEFF BRANICK, Judge, Jefferson County, Texas, MITCH WOODS, Sheriff's Office, Jefferson County, Texas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-40411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frazier v. Lewallyn et al
as 1:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Toye Dwayne Frazier
Defendant:
Aaron Lewallyn, Tina Lewallyn, Rachel Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colone v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Colone
Defendant:
Mitch Woods, Darren Cassidy, Cathy Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clubb v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Ray Clubb
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Jeff Branick, Mitch Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Hartman v. Layne Walker, et al
as 16-40396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN HARTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAYNE WALKER, Individually, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, TEXAS, MITCH WOODS and others
McNeely v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
James A McNeely
Defendant:
Mitch Woods, UP Reagan and Kent Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
