Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lynwood Cannon v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, et al
as 20-60556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNWOOD CANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
APPEAL COUNCIL DEPARTMENT, of the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review in Falls Church, VA 22041, ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and LINCOLN COUNTY MISSISSIPPI DISTRICT MANAGER
Sotelo et al v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Felipe Sotelo, Megan Kilee Sotelo and Jonathan Patrick Sotelo
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jackson v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 1:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Curee Lenell Jackson
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pradia v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 4:2014cv03089
Plaintiff:
Jai Dione Pradia
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pradia v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 4:2014mc02516
Plaintiff:
Jai Dione Pradia
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Paige v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review McCoy Federal Building
as 3:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Joann Paige
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review McCoy Federal Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murphy v. Attorney Disciplinary Board et al
as 3:2011cv00020
Defendant:
Attorney Disciplinary Board, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
