Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carr v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Troy Finner, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Post Master General
as 1:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Post Master General
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Brennan et al
as 4:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Walter W Turner
Defendant:
Megan J Brennan, Post Master General and United States Postal Service Southern Area
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Young v. United Stated Postal Service, et al
as 5:2014cv00113
Defendant:
American Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO, American Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO, San Antonio Alamo Area Local and United Stated Postal Service, Through Patrick R. Donahoe, Post Master General
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Lee County District Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2011cv00140
Defendant:
Austin Post Master, Austin Post Office, Inc., Bryan Post Master and others
Plaintiff:
Edward DeShan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Emmett v. Post Master, Huntsville Post Office et al
as 4:2010cv03343
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Post Master, Huntsville Post Office and John/Jane Doe Over Certified Mail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
