Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Reaves v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00835
Petitioner:
Samuel L. Reaves
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Reaves
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Lumpkin
as 22-10612
Petitioner / Appellant:
Samuel Reaves
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, David Gutierrez, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division, Ken Paxton, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reaves v. Lumpkin
as 22-10430
Petitioner / Appellant:
Samuel Reaves
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, David Gutierrez, TDCJ-Parole Division and Dale Stanley Hanna, Johnson Co District Attorney
Reaves, et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Keith Reaves and Lisa Reaves
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Reaves v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Samuel Reaves
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, David Gutierrez, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
Samuel Reaves
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
