Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russo et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rodger Michael Russo and Catherine Prior
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Pute v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Rodger De Pute
Defendant:
United States of America, K Bandas, Kenneth Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Rodgers v. Harris County Hospital District et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Yolanda Wall, Kimberly Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Rheavia Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodgers v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04531
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Rodgers
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
