Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Ragan v. Liberty Personal Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06365
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Ragan
Defendant:
Liberty Personal Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ragan v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00317
Petitioner:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Respondent:
Kelly R. Metz and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D.K. v. N.G., et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
D. K. and B. C.
Defendant:
Tad Pshigoda, M. S., J. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ragan v. Oliver et al
as 7:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Gary Gene Ragan
Defendant:
Thomas P Oliver and Fern M. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Ragan Pest Management v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Ragan Pest Management
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Holder v. Brannan
as 5:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Ragan Holder
Defendant:
Ronald Brannon and Harold Brannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ragan v. Robertson County, Texas, 82nd District
as 6:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Defendant:
Robertson County, Texas, 82nd District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragan v. Robertson County, Texas, 82nd District
as 4:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Gene Ragan
Defendant:
82nd District Court Robinson County and Robertson County, Texas, 82nd District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
