Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rawlinson v. Ovintiv USA, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Buddy Rawlinson
Defendant:
Ovintiv USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawlinson et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09292
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Winthrop U.S., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Rawlinson and Regenia M. Rawlinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rawlinson v. Magdalene Home, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Magdalene Home, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rawlinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Delk v. The Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Sarah Delk
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc. , Brandon Rawlinson and Color Spot Nurseries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
