Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lopez-Parker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert J. Lopez-Parker and Robert Jade Lopez-Parker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ross v. Lopez et al
as 5:2021cv00473
Defendant:
Jacob L. Harrison, Richard Saldivar, Davonte Head and others
Plaintiff:
James Ryan Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Robert Lopez-Parker
as 20-10490
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT JADE LOPEZ-PARKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lopez-Parker v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2019cv00143
Petitioner:
Robert Jade Lopez-Parker
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Apple v. Ayers et al
as 3:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lewis Apple, Jr
Defendant:
Herman Jordan, Pedro J Serna, Robert M Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apple v. Ayers et al
as 5:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lewis Apple, Jr
Defendant:
Herman Jordan, Pedro J Serna, Robert M Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Lockwood v. Gary Johnson, et al
as 19-10187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. LOCKWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT M. LOPEZ, Assistant and Security Personnel Gate Operations Warden, MAIN WARDEN ADRIAN A. AMONETT, Tex. TDCJ-ID Prison, John Montford Mental Health Unit, MR. GARY JOHNSON, Tex. TDCJ-ID Prison Operations Director, also known as Gary Schafer, also known as NFN Schandeling and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
