Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jackson v. Huffman
as 4:2023cv04630
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Joan Huffman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Jackson v. City of Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Defendant:
City of Houston Police Department, Troy Finner, Officer M.A. Kahn Badge #113967 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jackson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Arron Thompkins, Brian Collier, Janet Haney and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Arron Thompkins, Brian Collier, Janet Haney and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Samuel Jackson
as 20-20595
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel Joseph Jackson, also known as J. B.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03465
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03023
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al v. Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke et al
as 4:2019cv02939
Respondent:
Persons under Color as U.S. District Judges and Clerks, Deputy Clerks, District Courts, Austin and Waco Divisions, U.S. District and Appeals Courts, District of Columbia per persons misrepresenators of Judges, Clerks, and deputy clerks, Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke and others
Petitioner:
Samuel James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuel Jackson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20681
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROY JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
