Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sipe v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Tom Sipe
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rosales v. City Of Tyler et al
as 6:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Abdias Rosales
Defendant:
Texas City Of Tyler, Chief of Police J. Toler, Officer J. Herbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sipes v. Bell et al
as 4:2022cv00748
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Leah Askey, Detective Shawn Michael Bell, Sheriff John Cottle and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Sipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sipes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. and Stephanie Anders
Plaintiff:
Jillian Sipes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sipes v. Davis et al
as 6:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Michael D Davis and Elmer Beckworth
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert Sipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Shirley et al
as 6:2020cv00165
Defendant:
FNU Boykin, FNU Sipes, FNU Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Shirley et al
as 6:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Unknown Boykin, Unknown Sipes, Unknown Shirley and others
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sipe v. Norris et al
as 3:2018cv01165
Plaintiff:
Scott Anthony Sipe
Defendant:
Michael Norris , Hunt County Sheriffs Department and Jon Knudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caperton v Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brenda Sipes Caperton
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sipe v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02582
Plaintiff:
Karen S Sipe and James R Sipe
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
