Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Sanford v. AT&T
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Respondent:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanford v. AT&T
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanford v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Dora Sanford
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Central States Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Contreras et al
as 3:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Central States Health & Welfare Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Defendant:
Mercedes Contreras, Samantha Sanford and Norma Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Joseph v. Roszczvnialsk et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Joseph
Defendant:
Nicholas Roszczvnialsk, Sanford Ron and Kathryn E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford v. Kirst
as 24-30282
Plaintiff:
Jeffry L. Sanford, Individually, and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph Sanford
Defendant:
Joshua Kirst, H. Allen and City of Baton Rouge
Brasher v. 15th Judicial District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jaci Loveless Brasher
Defendant:
15th Judicial District Court, Susan Theall, David Blanchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Sanford and Aubrey Danielle Owings
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Breach of Contract
Haywood v. Texas Realtor
as 23-11240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Realtor, Ceo or Owner, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland, Owner of Pennymac Loan Services, L.L.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
