Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Stevenson v. Medical Staff
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Grieve et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
FNU Grieve and J Leet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCann v. Terrell et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCann, Jr.
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, Kevin Stevenson and Mike Mozingo
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Sams East Inc
as 5:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Stevenson
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and Sams East Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
