Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mong v. Sweeny Independent School District
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Tristan Mong
Defendant:
Sweeny Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Davis and Robert Sweeny
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Martin v. Driskell
as 21-40296
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU LNU, Warden Driskell, Supervisor Unknown and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Martin
LifeChek Holdings, Ltd et al v. Pharm House Drug, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02742
Plaintiff:
LifeChek Magnolia, LLC, LifeChek 336 Pharmacy, LLC, Kountze Pharmacy, LLC and others
Defendant:
Pharm House Drug, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Driskell et al
as 6:2019cv00311
Defendant:
Warden Driskell, Mrs. FNU Pearson, Elgene Mainus and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. City of Sweeny et al
as 3:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Bonner
Defendant:
City of Sweeny and Sweeny Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stambaugh v Sweeny Hospital District et al
as 3:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Glen Stambaugh
Defendant:
Sweeny Hospital District and Sweeny Community Hospital Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith v. Sweeny Independent School District et al
as 3:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Smith
Defendant:
Sweeny Independent School District , Amy Pope and Gerald Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shelley Soniat v. Department of HUD, et al
as 17-40031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELLEY SONIAT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DON D. BUSH, RICHARD SCHELL and others
Tumlinson v McCollister et al
as 3:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rosa Dale Tumlinson
Defendant:
Officer Francis McCollister, City of Sweeny, Sweeny Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
