Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Okorie v. University Mall, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
University Mall, LLC, Joseph R. Tullos, James Poncho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jackson v. Unknown Warden
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
LaKeevis T Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barganski v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Barganski
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bill Rusk
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yazdi v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Yazdi
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
