Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,762
Thomas v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff: Ketrick Thomas
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Majarro v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff: Noe Carrillo Majarro
Defendant: Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Bossier Medium Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: Herman Woods
Defendant: Warden Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Rule
as 4:2024cv00449
Petitioner: Brenda Hamilton
Respondent: Warden FNU Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner: Clarence Martin
Respondent: C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00645
Plaintiff: **Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castro v. Wallace
as 24-50379
Plaintiff: Hubert Edward Castro
Defendant: Warden Darren Wallace, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Chimdi Akwitti and others
Blake v. Rosalez
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner: Robert Timothy Blake
Respondent: Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Dauzat
as 24-30306
Petitioner: Richard F. Collins, Jr.
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Stevens v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Tristan Chandler Stevens
Defendant: Warden Baysore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?