Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Romero Thomas v. M. Haske, et al
as 23-1852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. HASKE, Teacher, sued in his personal capacity and S. JOHNSON, Sergeant, sued in his personal capacity
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, SHAWN BREWER, Warden and others
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Blanca Solis-Romero, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3199
Petitioner:
BLANCA LIDIA SOLIS-ROMERO and BRITANY NICOLE MONTOYA-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Michael Flournoy v. Jonathan Hemingway, et al
as 21-2604
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT LACHMAN, [UNKNOWN] CHAMBERS, A. VAUGHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL FLOURNOY
In re: Jose Romero-Parada
as 21-3473
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE MANUEL ROMERO-PARADA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
