Cases 11 - 20 of 30,986
Deas v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Kenneth Atkinson, Trevor Smith, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Ellis
as 5:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
April Ellis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
In Re Attorney Admission for Mitchell E. Esterle
as 5:2024aa00062
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Steger v. Willis et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Steger
Defendant:
Steven Willis and Mandie Appleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Zelesnik v. Keating et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Liz Keating, Cyrus Data, Pete Buttigieg and others
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgar T. Ragouzis and Edgar Thomas Ragouzis
Defendant:
Jr. Richardo O. Hamilton, John and Jane Doe(s) and ABC Legal Entities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Howell v. Abduvaliev et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dewight Howell
Cross Defendant:
Zaylovidin Abduvaliev and TJ Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. $43,210.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$43,210.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
