Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Neal v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Esler Neal
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Schrimer v. Powell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tyler Schrimer and Tyler Schirmer
Defendant:
Powell County Detention Center, Powell County Sheriff Department, George Nester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. Carey
as 3:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Shelby County, Kentucky, Shelby County, Kentucky doing business as Shelby County Detention Center, Bobby Waits and others
Plaintiff:
Reece and Joshua Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Neal v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00340
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 0:2020cv00028
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neal Coleman and Pamela J Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. Banks et al
as 0:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
DeSean Neal
Defendant:
Amy Ferguson, Christopher Banks, Julie Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Banks et al
as 0:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
DeSean Neal
Defendant:
John Doe, Christopher Banks, Julie Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. USA
as 5:2018cv00422
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Neal Scott Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McGinnis et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
W. Terry McBrayer, Carolyn Warnock, Brian Neal and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal v. Strucke et al
as 2:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
James T. Neal
Defendant:
Christy Strucke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
