Cases 21 - 30 of 89,472
Joseph v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03193
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferris v. Canadian National Railway et al
as 2:2024cv11516
Plaintiff:
Donald Ferris
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway, CSX Transportation, Inc., GENESEE & WYOMING INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bilka v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65694
Plaintiff:
Samantha Bilka
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Faller v. JACZ MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Faller
Defendant:
JACZ MANAGEMENT, LLC, JESSICA LIVELY, Jason Lively and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Tillis et al v. Parson et al
as 2:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Aluntra R. Tillis and Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Cameran L. Parson and EAN Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Guss v. Durgin, M.D.
as 3:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Linn Ann Guss
Defendant:
Robert H. Durgin, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Yaroslav Ilnytskyy v. Equipnet, Inc., et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
YAROSLAV ILNYTSKYY
Defendant:
EQUIPNET, INC. and CSLIQ CORPORATION
Intervenor:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Mattinson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03149
Plaintiff:
Shad Mattinson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wirth v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Lonnie M Wirth
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fragua v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Deborah Fragua
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
