Cases 51 - 60 of 3,296
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
PD v. Sampson et al
as 2:2024cv10894
Plaintiff:
P. D. and PD
Defendant:
James Sampson, Tamara L. Spencer, Carolyn Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd v. Genesee, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10893
Plaintiff:
George Boyd
Defendant:
County of Genesee, Sheriff Christopher Swanson, Deputy Robert Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe #057
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tom Djonovic, et al v. Carol Septer, et al
as 24-1284
Plaintiff:
TOM DJONOVIC and JOHN P. KELMENDI
Defendant:
CAROL SEPTER, Code Enforcement Officer, GUARESIMO, Shelby Township, MI Police Officer, JOHN DOE, 2 & 3, Shelby Township, MI Police Officers and others
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
