Cases 91 - 100 of 99,873
Dorsey, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2024cv00852
Petitioner:
Michael Dorsey, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hearn v. USA
as 1:2024cv00863
Petitioner:
Ronnie Hearn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reed v. Hunsinger
as 3:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
Jeff Reed
Respondent:
Angela Hunsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Neil v. Lake County Jail et al.
as 1:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean O'Neil
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Sheriff Frank LeonBruno, Head Nurse Voyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Watson
as 2:2024cv02365
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimes v. USA
as 2:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Andy Dennison Kimes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wethington v. Parris et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wethington
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacy Oaks, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
