Cases 101 - 110 of 7,479
Wartley #462928 v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Wartley #462928
Defendant:
Unknown Hoffman and Marsha Nurkala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters #588025 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00496
Petitioner:
Kwauntay Waters #588025
Defendant:
H. Washington, John Davids, Unknown Vonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2024cv11270
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hardy
Defendant:
Whitaker, Wallenman, Lipset and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Marshall v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall
Defendant:
Rewerts, John Doe, West and others
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv10683
Plaintiff:
Jumaane Jones and Jumaane Amunra Jones
Defendant:
Campbell, Krueger, Rombach and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Spencer v. Stoyk et al
as 2:2024cv11255
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Spencer
Defendant:
Stoyk, Duperron and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
