Cases 31 - 40 of 2,321
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility, Unknown Amsley and Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance et al v. Nance et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Barry Thomas Nance and O'leisha Nance
Defendant:
Leslie Nance, Keeon Nance, Bells Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 4:2024cv10555
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Garcia, Nevins and others
Matthew Jones v. Dave Yost
as 24-3184
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JONES
Respondent:
DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Robert Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belinda Jones v. Jeremy Howard
as 24-1164
Petitioner:
BELINDA JONES
Respondent:
JEREMY HOWARD, Warden
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10502
Plaintiff:
Michael Magik Jones
Defendant:
MDOC, People of the State of Michigan and Ingham County Jail
Stiff-Brown #587330 v. Shafer et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Duane Stiff-Brown #587330
Defendant:
Unknown Shafer, Unknown Leonhardt, Unknown Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
