Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gilliam v. Medtronic, Inc. (JRG3)
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randy David Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ash v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00892
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linn Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wheaton v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Delana Wheaton
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC, UC Health, Center For Advanced Spine Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gordon
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC, UC Health, LLC, Center For Advanced Spine Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Presser et al v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Robert Presser and Margie Presser
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC , UC Health, LLC , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Picone et al v. West Chester Hospital, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Lora Picone and Jeff Picone
Defendant:
West Chester Hospital, LLC , UC Health, LLC , Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vega v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00330
Plaintiff:
Rene Vega
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levine v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2012cv13082
Plaintiff:
Leon Levine
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steck et al v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Karen Steck and Edward Steck
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd., Regeneration Technologies, Inc., Spinalgraft Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
