Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Value Drug Company v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022oe00180
Plaintiff:
Value Drug Company
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc and others
Rhodes et al v. Rhodes Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45076
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Beverly Sackler, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Silvers, Lea Anne Spradlen and Roger Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhodes et al v. Rhodes Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00885
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Beverly Sackler, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Silvers, Lea Anne Spradlen and Roger Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Abbvie Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00892
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Duramed Pharmaceuticals Sales Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01197
Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc.
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jabo's Pharmacy, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Jabo's Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
