Cases 1 - 10 of 201
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Roseman, Sr. v. Grant et al
as 2:2024cv10830
Plaintiff:
John L. Roseman, Sr.
Defendant:
Nanci J. Grant, Shalina D. Kumar, Nathan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Cook v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jamika Cook
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County and Patrick F. Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant:
DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kiner v. City of Memphis Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Rev Gerald Kiner
Defendant:
City of Memphis Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Officer L Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ashley McKenzie Smith
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Cerelyn Davis, Nahum Dorme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
