Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kevin Koelzer v. Aaron Westrick, et al
as 22-1835
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEVIN KOELZER
Defendant / Appellant:
EVAN SAXE, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL REED, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, COLE HOYER, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
AARON WESTRICK, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, AUSTIN DIEKEVERS, GREGG ARSENAULT and others
Koelzer v. Westrick et al
as 1:2019cv00618
Defendant:
Cole Hoyer, Aaron Westrick, Marilyn Innes and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Koelzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Thomas-Moore et al
as 2:2016cv02834
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Taylor
Defendant:
Betty Thomas-Moore, Lonnie Thompson, Edward Stanton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorazio v. Coulson et al
as 1:2016cv02187
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Dorazio
Defendant:
Charles E. Coulson , Gianine A. Germano , Daniel A. Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imam v. Aneshansel et al
as 2:2015cv02604
Plaintiff:
Missionary Imam
Defendant:
Rick Aneshansel, Sheldon Miller, J. Phillip Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Shreve, et al v. Franklin County Ohio, et al
as 13-3119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHREVE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DAWN FIORE-BRUNO, Individually and MICHAEL WORLEY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL REED, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO, MARK BARRETT, Individually and in his official capacity (Franklin County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy, Corrections), STEPHAN L. MARTIN, Individually and others
Shreve et al v. Franklin County Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Shreve , Michael Reed and Dawn Fiore-Bruno
Defendant:
Franklin County Ohio, Sheriff Franklin County, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
