Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cynthia Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 24-3193
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MAREK LUNDEEN
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lundeen
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Denise Sherrills v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-3374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE SHERRILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv10938
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Joseph Jones, Ernest Cornelius and John Doe
Counter Claimant:
Doshia Banks
Felicia Rosario v. William Cyrus, et al
as 22-5764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELICIA M. ROSARIO, (Cyrus)
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM RAY CYRUS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Rosario v. Cyrus et al
as 3:2021cv00922
Plaintiff:
Felicia M. Rosario
Defendant:
William Ray Cyrus, Wells Fargo Bank, U.S. Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. Hamilton County Recorder et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Summit County Domestic Relations Court, Wells Fargo Bank, 9th District Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christenberry v. OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00360
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC, OCWEN Beena Ashar, Alti Source and others
Plaintiff:
Doris Annette Christenberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thurmond v. Warren et al
as 5:2017cv10088
Defendant:
Cove Map Fund, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank and RENEE SHELID
Plaintiff:
Dawan Pierce Thurmond [E-Filer]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
