Cases 1 - 10 of 1,160
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Eddins v. Southeastern Michigan Health Association
as 2:2024cv11326
Plaintiff:
Micia Eddins
Defendant:
Southeastern Michigan Health Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Reed v. CC Apartments, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Mario Reed
Defendant:
CC Apartments, LLC, Bres, LLC doing business as Buchanan Realty Group and Josh Lefevre Construction Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Thompson v. Medallion Management, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Defendant:
Medallion Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Lynn Kizer v. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
as 24-5207
Plaintiff:
LYNN KIZER
Defendant:
ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
Jeffrey Bilyeu, et al v. UT-Battelle, LLC
as 24-5418
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BILYEU and JESSICA BILYEU
Defendant:
UT-BATTELLE, LLC
Lucio v. Regency Owosso, LLC
as 2:2024cv11102
Plaintiff:
Lola Lucio
Defendant:
Regency Owosso, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nitschke et al v. John Maher Builders, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Nitschke and Cynthia George
Defendant:
John Maher Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Kramer v. Cedar Lee Special Improvement District
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kramer
Defendant:
Cedar Lee Special Improvement District and City of Cleveland Heights
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
