Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Rose v. May
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
John R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Petitioner:
Steffany Rose Hamner
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Department of Children Services and Davidson County Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ledford v. Rose
as 4:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Timothy Leon Ledford
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledford v. Rose
as 3:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Timothy Leon Ledford
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Guilfoy v. Sharon Rose
as 23-5348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY GUILFOY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON N. ROSE, Warden
Turner v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex)
as 2:2023cv02075
Petitioner:
Rodney V. Turner
Respondent:
Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex) and Sharon N. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Rose
as 3:2022cv01016
Petitioner:
Eric Tyre Patton
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blocker v. Genovese
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Maurice Blocker and Ricky M. Blocker
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese and Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Julius T. Moore
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
