Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv12387
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flowers #13667-040 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers #13667-040
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hedges v. United States Marshals Service
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Gregory Hedges
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brodie v. United States Marshall Service
as 3:2020cv00095
Respondent:
United States Marshall Service
Petitioner:
Robert E. Brodie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ibrihim v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent:
Jackson, A.W. Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Greene et al
as 4:2018cv00884
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Jerry Greene, Deputy Johnson, Deputy Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hills v. United States Marshal Service
as 4:2016cv11798
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Hills
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
