Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Pierce v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cornelius D. Pierce
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, Darron Hall, Carla Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Pierce v. Williams, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, SERGEANT . BURLERSON, OFFICER SMOLINSKI and others
Roger Pierce v. Washtenaw County, MI Jail, et al
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI JAIL, DARYL PARKER, Doctor, PATRICE MORGAN and others
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Guess v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Justin Guess
Defendant:
Tim L Pierce, Penny J Pierce, Corey Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Suthers et al
as 3:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
John Suthers, f/n/u Elders, f/n//u Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Bannon v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee O'Bannon
Defendant:
Dr. Allen and Kerry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Washtenaw County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv12786
Plaintiff:
Roger Pierce
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Jail, Williams, Teresa Unknown and others
Pierce v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv12767
Plaintiff:
Roger Pierce
Defendant:
Lt. Williams, Sgt. Burlerson, Smolinski and others
Evans v. Franklin County Correctional Center, II et al
as 2:2022cv03669
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Nathaniel Evans
Defendant:
Franklin County Correctional Center, II, Sheriff Dallas Baldwin, Mike Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
