Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Fellhauer v. King et al
as 4:2023cv10776
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Fellhauer
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Jail, State of Michigan and others
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Radley v. Nashville Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Radley
Defendant:
Nashville Police Department, Unknown Police Warrant Officer, Williamson County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bales v. Turner et al
as 3:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bales
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Becky Joyce, Mr. Creg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Ward et al
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Cedric Whiteside
Defendant:
Ward, Harness, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Ward et al
as 1:2014cv01135
Plaintiff:
Cedric Whiteside
Defendant:
Ward, Harness, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole et al v. Warren County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Stuart Cole and Loren Patterson
Defendant:
Warren County, Kentucky , Mike Buchanon , Jackie T. Strode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
Doyal J Morgan
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Eugene Watson, Matt Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett et al v. Hamblen County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
William D Corbett and Carolyn S Corbett
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee, Hamblen County Commission, Esco R Jarnigan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
