Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ulysses Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department, et al
as 24-3710
Defendant:
OFFICER MARK BOGGS, OFFICER JORDAN MOORE, OFFICER CLAY BLAIR and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES LEE FEAGIN
Vaughn v. Starta et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Sebastian D. Vaughn and Arion J. Boggs
Defendant:
Frank Starta, FNU Giles, FNU Pulawski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Lee Feagin
Defendant:
Mansfield Police Department, Officer Jordan Moore, Officer Mark Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belt v. Northeast Regional Health Services Administrator et al
as 0:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Jose A. Santana, Special Agent-In-Charge, FCC - Ashland, KY., Chief Psychologist, FCC/FPC/FCI - Ashland, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Law et al
as 0:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Billy E. Barker
Defendant:
Timothy Law, Correct Care Solutions and R.W. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Elder
as 4:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kirby Boggs
Defendant:
Terry Elder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Wallace et al
as 0:2015cv00005
Defendant:
Charles Wallace , Mike Malone, R.W. Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Boggs et al
as 0:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Fleming Logan, Jr.
Defendant:
R.W. Boggs, Carter County, KY and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Boggs
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
