Cases 1 - 10 of 555
O'Bannon v. K.C.P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee O'Bannon
Defendant:
K.C.P.C., Matthew Douglas and Ron Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid et al v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Logan McDavid, Perry Anthony Herring, Jr., Vincent Tyler Matthews and others
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN and Anderson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Householder
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alward v. Newell et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Seain Hull v. David Yost, et al
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
SEAIN C. HULL
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, MATTHEW E. CRALL, SCOTT KENT and others
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfenbarger v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10616
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Wolfenbarger
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Bryan Morrison, Troy Chrisman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
