Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Brooks v. Hawkins County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Dallas Dunn, Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Stengel et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Grimes
Defendant:
Gerina D. Whethers, Officer Shelton, Remy Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Sexton et al
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
James Moses
Defendant:
CoreCivic Medical Staff, Manager Futrell, Warden Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Shelton v. Windsor
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
James Shelton
Defendant:
FNU Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dane Duckett v. Cumberland County, TN Sheriff Department, et al
as 22-5961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANE L. DUCKETT
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, TN SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Inmate Corrections Division, SHERIFF CASEY COX, CAPTAIN TIM CLAFLIN, Jail Administrator and others
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Corrections, John Christiansen and others
Vink v. Boomershine et al
as 5:2021cv12803
Plaintiff:
Brian Vink
Defendant:
Mark A. Boomershine, Jordan Block, Doug Shelton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
