Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICA HUSS, JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ERICA HUSS, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Brown v. FBOP et al
as 6:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Roland Brown
Defendant:
FBOP, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Alzid v. Porter et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Majid Alzid and Christopher Morgan
Defendant:
Gizelle Porter, Jeffery Stokes, Scott Corrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #381114 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, L. Parish, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamar Jackson #381114
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Warden Gregory A. Kizziah, Michael Horrowitz, Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keller v. Batts et al
as 2:2018cv02818
Defendant:
F/N/U Jacobs, Ann Simon, Victoria Buzzanga and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
