Cases 61 - 70 of 400
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figel #179188 v. Davids et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Defendant:
Robert Naple, John Davids, Lynn Sandborn and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Figel #179188
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babbitt v. Anderson et al
as 2:2023cv10598
Defendant:
John Doe, Anderson and Bob
Plaintiff:
Patrick Babbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Pauley et al
as 7:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Steven Stanley
Defendant:
Clint Pauley and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv10416
Plaintiff:
Rico Menefee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, M. Floyd and others
Tony Vandee v. Dickerson, et al
as 23-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY LEROY VANDEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DICKERSON, MDOC, JOHN DOE #1, Correctional Officer with MDOC, JOHN DOE #2, Correctional Officer with MDOC and others
Mitchell v. Lamarca et al
as 2:2023cv10325
Plaintiff:
Orlando Demetrius Mitchell
Defendant:
Frank Lamarca, Henry Ford Allegiance Hospital and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spragans v. USA et al
as 7:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawan I. Spragans
Defendant:
USA, Mr. L. T. Moore, Ms. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barber v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2023cv10095
Plaintiff:
Tre Barber
Defendant:
Cunningham and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
