Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Acosta v. AUTO TINT CITY, LLC; and et al
as 2:2019cv11490
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
ROBERT BLACKMER and AUTO TINT CITY, LLC; and
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Acosta v. Southeastern Provision, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Southeastern Provision, LLC and James Brantley
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta
Acosta v. Tim Jurisin Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00251
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Timothy R. Jurisin and Tim Jurisin Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Nina's Health Care Services LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01774
Defendant:
Grace Fongod, Individual, Fairfield Home Care, LLC, Nina's Health Care Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Casa Real Bistro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01360
Defendant:
Gerardo Ortiz, Casa Real Bistro, Inc. and Luciana Ortiz
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Rab Communications, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01513
Defendant:
RAB COMMUNICATIONS Rab and Rab Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. The North End Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00753
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
The North End Cafe, LLC and NECV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Addison
as 2:2018cv00092
Respondent:
Sheri Addison
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. AWP, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
AWP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Maru Grand Rapids, LLC, et al.
as 1:2018cv01175
Defendant:
Maru Restaurant LLC, Maru East Lansing, LLC, Maru Midland, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
