Cases 1 - 10 of 2,333
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Schnoblen v. DTE Energy Company et al
as 2:2024cv11263
Plaintiff:
Michael Schnoblen
Defendant:
DTE Energy Company and DTE Energy Corporate Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Pollard v. Revere Plastics Systems, LLC
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Pollard
Defendant:
Revere Plastics Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Aubrey v. Radial, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerad Aubrey
Defendant:
Radial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Louks v. Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11233
Plaintiff:
Shana Louks
Defendant:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wheeling v. City of Winchester
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wheeling
Defendant:
City of Winchester
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rhoda v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robertta Rhoda
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Wimsatt v. Petro Towery, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Erik Wimsatt
Defendant:
Petro Towery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
