Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy et al v. Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy and Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority
Cross Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard, Inc., 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Environmental Matters
Kevin Cassaday v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 23-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ANDREW N. LIVERIS, CEO, ROBERT STEELMAN and others
Job Creators Network, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4093
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
JOB CREATORS NETWORK, INDEPENDENT BAKERS ASSOCIATION, LAWRENCE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor:
CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Ive Cahio, et al v. Drexel Chemical Company
as 21-5036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REMI BASIE, GERALDO DAVID, LUIS SENTELIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DREXEL CHEMICAL COMPANY
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Hazard Control Technologies, Inc, DowDupont, Inc., Noble Industrial Supply Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, and the STATE of MICHIGAN, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States of America et al v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 1:2019cv13292
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan, Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Eastman Chemical Company et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2019cv00168
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Eastman Chemical Company, Taminco Corporation and Solutia Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Gary Carty v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al
as 19-5334
Defendant:
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PROGRAM and EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY, as Plan Administrator for the Eastman Chemical Company Welfare Benefit Program
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARY CARTY
Defendant / Appellant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Gary Carty v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al
as 19-5327
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY, as Plan Administrator for the Eastman Chemical Company Welfare Benefit Program and EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY WELFARE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARY CARTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
