Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Blocker v. Jonker et al
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Robert J. Jonker, Michigan, State of, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency, Joe Biden, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey v. Wickersham et al
as 2:2021cv10863
Defendant:
David O'Brien, Anthony Wickersham, Duluth Holdings Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Christopher Corey
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Bank of America, Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2020cv01058
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan, State of and Bank of America
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltrusaitis et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 3:2020cv12793
Plaintiff:
Satish Doshi, Richard Broecker, Mark Skelly and others
Defendant:
John 6 Doe, John 4 Doe, Alphons Iacobelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2020cv00988
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan, State of and Bank of America
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. State of Michigan et al
as 1:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and State of Michigan
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Michigan, State of
Plaintiff:
Corey Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
